A comparative assessment of basel iiiii and solvency ii springerlink. Solvency ii framework directive to be adopted by council and parliament ceiops advice on implementation, provides guidelines, recommendations consultation with stakeholders actuaries and industry calls for advice solvency ii three pillar approach threepillar approach recommended in kpmg study for eu and reflecting basel ii. Under basel iii, a banks tier 1 and tier 2 assets must be at least 10. Very little consideration to capital quality and very rough approach on risk weighted assets. Securities financing transactions and repos can be netted under basel ii rules derivatives converted to a loan equivalent value per basel ii rules mtm plus addon other off balance sheet items converted at 100% ccf, except cancellable lines of credit, at 10% february 2011 slide 17 basel iii time to act. An analysis of regulatory consistency under the new capital standards. Why basel iii and solvency ii will hurt corporate borrowing in europe more than in the u. Regarding pillar i of basel ii, several studies discuss the aggregation method for market and credit risk capital charges see, e. This presentation based on an imf working paper explores similarities and differences between banks and insurers and between basel iii and solvency ii.
The basel iii framework seeks a 99% value at risk for market risks and a 99. This column has underlined the differences and similarities between insurers and banks with regard to systemic interaction. From basel i to basel iii overview of the journey basel. In practice it is likely that many of the stress tests are quite manual, whereby. In practice, capital requirements will vary for different institutional investors due to differences in. Daniela laas and caroline franziska siegel are at the institute of insurance economics, university of st. A comparative assessment of basel iiiii and solvency ii. As well as the current basel iii rules, our analysis covers the proposals for the forthcoming basel iii market and credit risks frameworks see bcbs, 2014c, and bcbs, 2014d.
We follow the threepillar architecture and compare key framework elements of basel iiiii and solvency ii to reveal major differences and similarities as well as. Crd iv coverage globally active banks all eu insurers legal status must be transposed into local legislation eu directive main drivers refines basel ii in reaction to recent financial crisis. Specifically, they will be required to meet a minimum tlac requirement of at least 16% of the resolution groups riskweighted assets starting in 2019 and at least 18% in 2022. Comparison of the regulatory approach in insurance and banking. The comparison is conducted against the background of the industries. Economic capital versus regulatory capital for market risk. This charge is then added to the target capital for insurance and market risks. There is a fair amount of overlap between basel iii and solvency ii. Our basel iv poster shows the legal basis, identifies the relevant basel papers and illustrates the. In the same section it also states that unlike basel ii, the correlation between risk components is explicitly recognized by solvency ii. The lcr builds on traditional liquidity coverage ratio methodologies used internally by banks to assess exposure to contingent liquidity events.
Basel i, basel ii and solvency ii frm study notes frm. Basel iii globally active banks and solvency ii all eu insurers both well advanced and have much in common but different histories, driving forces and business models of industries being regulated lead to substantive differences in detail substantially independent development but largely coincident implementation timing. Solvency ii is also principled based but has an attendant credible threat of enforcement. Basel iii and solvency ii should improve the stability of these connections, but could have unintended consequences for cost of capital, funding patterns, interconnectedness, and risk migration. Solvency ii is broader than basel ii iii in that it is a total balance sheet approach incorporating assets and liabilities whereas basel ii iii concentrates on credit, market and operational risk. In the short term, the ifrs 9 impairment model puts extra pressure on institutions, might prompt a shift from the standardized approach to the more challenging irb one, and encourages banks to address their data governance shortcomings and break internal silos.
Basel iii, solvency ii, cost of capital, funding, interconnectedness. The new regulation requirements introduced by basel iii and solvency ii focus on the solvency risk in order to impose a required amount of equity value on the base of the risk associated to the investments of asset portfolio. Basel iii capital and liquidity standards faqs regulatory element proposed requirement higher minimum tier 1 common equity requirement. For example, systemic risk is more pronounced in the banking. These innovations and extensions of basel ii are known as basel iii. Basel iii, cocos could qualify as either additional tier 1 at1 or tier 2 t2 capital graph 2. Basel iii versus solvency ii an analysis of regulatory.
According to the basel ii definition of credit risk, this module only refers to. Solvency ii provides a comprehensive and holistic risk and capital management framework for insurers, and similarly to basel ii, uses a threepillar concept. Invoke efiling insurance is the xbrl solution that bridges the solvency ii reporting gap. For basel iii we discuss both the standard approach and the internal ratingsbased approach. Motivated by the regulatory authorities goal, this paper evaluates whether the basel iii and solvency ii standard approaches for market and credit risks are consistent. In contrast, solvency ii considers the company as a whole and requires a 99. This analyze will be thus naturally provided in comparison with basel ii amendments and solutions. Comparison of the regulatory approach in insurance and. Our new basel iv poster offers you an indepth overview of all regulatory actions of the basel committee in relation with basel iv. The solvency numbers will be more volatile than, say, banks basel iii capital ratios, so many insurers will set a target range and expect to fluctuate within that. Differences in the ability to change assets and liabilities.
The total net cash outflows for the scenario are to be calculated for 30 calendar days into the future. Explain the difference between the basel iiiii and the solvency ii frameworks for the capture of diversification benefits. Explain the difference between classes of risks taken into account in basel iiiii and solvency ii. The aim of this paper is to conduct a comprehensive and structured comparative assessment of basel iiiii and solvency ii in order to detect similarities and differences as well as the benefits and. Basel ii and iii key regulatory solvencyrelated characteristics 1. Solvency ii standard european commission, 2009, linder and ronkainen, 2004, eling et al. The former, includes papers on the capital standards of basel ii, basel iii, and solvency ii, as well as comparisons among them. At the same time, the regulatory regime for banking, basel ii, has been revised in response to the financial crisis.
The farreaching differences in the two prudential frameworks solvency ii for insurers and basel iii for banks are a clear indication of the farreaching differences between the two business models. The basel committee on banking supervision adopted in 2004 what is commonly referred to as basel ii, which focuses on risk weights for assets held by banks. Differentiate between solvency capital requirements scr and minimum capital requirements mcr, and describe the repercussions to an insurance company for breaching the scr and mcr under the solvency ii framework. Possible unintended consequences of basel iii and solvency ii. The internal model for credit risk have to be calibrated to the same risk measure as used by basel ii, namely the value at risk on the 99% quantile. Basel iii versus solvency ii an analysis of regulatory consistency under the new capital standards daniela laas institute of insurance economics, univ.
We dispose today a good experience and fresh knowledge of basel ii accord in the matter of risk management and control. The aim of this paper is to conduct a comprehensive and structured comparative assessment of basel iiiii and solvency ii in order to detect similarities and differences as well as the benefits and drawbacks of both regimes, which might be profitably addressed. Solvency ii reform derives many advantages from its predecessor in the banking sector. Analysis of infrastructure debt under ftk, solvency ii and. In the long term, the convergence between ifrs 9 and basel iii will improve risk. It then highlights possible unintended consequences of basel iii and solvency ii on topics such as cost of capital, funding patterns, interconnectedness and. Basel committee on banking supervision bcbs to discuss the shortcomings of the basel ii capital accord and come up with possible amendments.
Different histories and drivers 11 basel iii solvency ii underlying source regulators bcbs eu commission c. Business banks finance laws, regulations and rules standards financial crises financial markets numerical analysis swaps finance. First international framework for capital adequacy or solvency of banks. According to our calculations in table 3, incremental borrowing costs resulting from the increased capital requirements and liquidity charge could be between 50 bps and 70 bps for investmentgrade issuers and between 92. Explain the difference between basel iiiii and the solvency ii frameworks with respect to. The computation of capital requirements and the eligible types of capital is the concern of pillar i. Some sets of presentation slides comparing the two frameworks can be found here. Solvency ii is broader than basel iiiii in that it is a total balance sheet. A new practical approach to asset liability management for. Basel ii set capital requirements based on expos ure type corporate, sovereign, bank, retail, sme, equity, etc and the proba bility of default pd, loss given default lgd, and exposure. While the instructions of the last qis for basel ii filled about 50 pages, the. Basel iii is an international regulatory accord that introduced a set of reforms designed to improve the regulation, supervision, and risk management within the banking sector.
The three pillars of basel iiiii and solvency ii are explained and compared in section 3 pillar 1, section 4 pillar 2, and section 5 pillar 3, and the results of the comparison are summarized and reflected in light of the respective objectives in section 6. Under pillar iii, the disclosure of risk management information to the. Basel ii, which was released in 2004, used a 3pillar approach to enhance risk measurement and assess operational risks of those financial institutions. This paper identifies the key differences between banking and insurance regulation which. The key difference between basel 1 2 and 3 is that basel 1 is established to specify a minimum ratio of capital to riskweighted assets for the banks whereas basel 2 is established to introduce supervisory responsibilities and to further strengthen the minimum capital requirement and basel 3 to promote the need for liquidity buffers an additional layer of equity. Ifrs 9 impairment model and the basel framework moodys. Different capital charges for the same type and amount of risk may lead to regulatory arbitrage. In the starting blocks for pillar 3 invokesoftware. Our results show that even though basel iiiii and solvency ii appear to be very similar at first glance, the specific contents of the three pillars differ significantly in the basel iiiii and solvency ii frameworks, partly because of the different characteristics of the industries. Comparison between basel iiiii and solvency ii the aim of this paper is to conduct a comprehensive but concise indepth comparison between basel iiiii and solvency ii. Crd iv coverage globally active banks all eu insurers legal status must be transposed into local legislation eu directive main drivers refines basel ii. Iii, and solvency ii capital standards for asset risks in light of this regulatory objective.
880 317 339 1595 955 811 343 426 390 143 890 646 633 66 782 1466 253 779 1020 654 1306 1304 888 321 1010 1033 1094 564 282 939 1053